In West Orange, a church divided
In this article, three hypocrisies of breakaway traditionalist catholics are exposed:
"To say that St. Anthony of Padua, the church Rev. Paul Wickens started nine years ago, is a haven for traditionalists is an understatement. And with his death this year, the search for just the right successor to the old founder has split the parishioners of this unusual West Orange church.
"The current boycotters say they have nothing personal against Wickens' replacement, the Rev. John Perricone, a conservative Catholic in his own right who in many ways seems a perfect fit for St. Anthony's.
"Perricone, who started at St. Anthony's Dec. 1, is founder of the group 'Christifidelis,' which is dedicated to the Latin Mass.
"Still, many longtime St. Anthony's parishioners reject him because he is an archdiocese priest, officially placed on loan to the chapel by the archdiocese.
"At his last archdiocese post, Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Orange, Perricone celebrated Mass in the modern way that traditionalists deplore, in English, facing the pews, and letting lay people touch the host.
"'This Perricone, he's on both waters, he offers both Masses -- the Latin Mass and the modern Mass. And we do not accept that,' said Elvira Valdez, who joined St. Anthony's in 1998 and has attended motel Masses."
"We only accept the ancient Mass, the old Mass, the Latin Mass. That's why Father Wickens stayed clear cut away from the archdiocese, because they would make him accept the modern Mass as equal to the old Mass."
HYPOCRISY #1: If you are faithful to the Church founded by Christ, you will be loyal. Indeed, it is the "body of Christ" and these folks are cutting off a fingernail for themselves. Worse, this laity portends to judge this ordained priest and question his committment to the latin mass as if such fidelity alone was the church. This parallels Martin Luther's doctrine of "Sola Scriptura" - all one needs is the Latin Mass..."Sola Latin". That certainly strains the concept of apostolic succession, the concept on which the Catholic Church traces itself directly back to it's founding by Christ. Recognition of that lineage and it's authority is part of Catholic Tradition. Another example:
"At a time when they would rather rally around a new priest, hundreds have boycotted the chapel for makeshift Masses at a Ramada Inn in East Hanover and a VFW Post and the Wellesley Inn in Fairfield."
"Locally, the latest alternative Masses were at the VFW Post in Fairfield Saturday, for Christmas, and Sunday, drawing about 200."
"A similar crowd attended a motel Mass in Fairfield earlier this month, where people knelt on the green patterned carpet of a kneeler-less conference room and received Communion from the Rev. John Fullerton, flown in for the occasion from Missouri.
"Fullerton is with the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, which was founded by French Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, who was excommunicated after refusing to the accept the 1960s reforms."
HYPOCRISY #2: So in these traditionalists eyes, it's holier to worship in a place that hosts drunken office parties and comic book conventions than a church whose very existence is consecrated to the worship of God! Amazing. How does the tabernacle play into this - rolled in on a laundry cart? Does the brass rail on the cash bar double as a communion rail? This is nothing more than a Catholic-styled storefront church. Again, the Church has defined what is required of a sacred space, and the Ramada ain't it.
The presence of the Pius X priest is self-explanitory. Excommunicated means a real break with the Church, no matter how adamant they deny it.
"...many who stopped attending St. Anthony's feel the church's three board members, who approached the archdiocese about Perricone, disregarded Wickens' wishes by bringing in an archdiocese priest.
"A week ago, a group of them filed suit in Essex County Chancery Court, saying the statute under which the church was incorporated lets all members, not just trustees, pick the priest."
HYPOCRISY #3: Self-governance. Essentially, this bunch would now be seen as traditionalist-Congregationalist-Catholics!
In these three instances, it's quite clear that by trying to become more Catholic, this misguided souls are actually embracing tenets of protestanism. How ironic. These people are teetering on the edge of sedevacantism, which is the ultimate denial of the chair of Peter. How possibly can this bring one closer to Christ?






